Green C 01:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC) I moved it to the budget section we'll see if that sticks.
#The martian movie rover free#
Wikipedia is not that structured, each article is free to include whatever information is relevant to the topic.
#The martian movie rover professional#
If Wikieditor1377 only wants professional film commentators fine, but Wikipedia is not limited to that. Next the accolades section is just that, it includes notable opinions and reviews. NASA helped develop the film, the President funds NASA, and the President said something positive about the film. He wrote the budget for NASA and if he said something about a film in relation to Mars it is relevant because the film clearly influenced him enough to say something about it. This opinion is notable for a couple reasons. It was the opinion of US President Obama at the time the sitting president.
If people arbitrarily add individual opinions to the accolade section the wikipedia will just become more disorganized. The critical reception section is where we often find professional film critics opinions and review aggregation companies results. Someone added an individual's opinion to the accolade section of this film, even though that section is reserved for award giving organizations such as the academy awards, the golden globes and such. Adding individual opinions to the accolade section
0 kommentar(er)
